IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2025v4p226-239.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Different Views On Human Resources Crisis Management And Economic Efficiency: Does Employee Position Matter?

Author

Listed:
  • BRATU ANA-MARIA

    (BUCHAREST UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, BUCHAREST, ROMANIA)

Abstract

In an increasingly unpredictable economic and social landscape, the connection between human resource management (HRM) and organizational crisis response has gained strategic importance. This study examines employee perceptions of the role HRM practices play in supporting effective decision-making during crisis situations, with a particular focus on maximizing economic efficiency. A quantitative research approach was employed, using 48 questionnaire responses collected from employees across Romanian companies. Findings reveal that HRM is perceived not only as a support function, but as a key driver of organizational adaptability. Respondents identified communication, cost reduction, employee motivation, and support mechanisms as critical HR practices that contribute to maintaining performance, adaptability, and cohesion during crises. Notably, employees in management positions consistently rated the importance and implementation of HR measures higher than those in executive positions, suggesting a perceptual gap that may affect policy effectiveness and internal alignment. These differences emphasize the need for inclusive and clearly communicated HR strategies across all hierarchical levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Bratu Ana-Maria, 2025. "Different Views On Human Resources Crisis Management And Economic Efficiency: Does Employee Position Matter?," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4, pages 226-239, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2025:v:4:p:226-239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2025-04/26_Bratu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2025:v:4:p:226-239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Ecobici Nicolae to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.