IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2015v3p42-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Classification Of Eu Countries In Terms Of The Evolution Of The Ghg Indicator Using Cluster Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • STELIAC NELA

    ("BABES-BOLYAI" UNIVERSITY, CLUJ-NAPOCA, FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION)

Abstract

The challenges encountered by women in accessing and penetrating the labour market are undeniable realities of the present. One of the shortcomings of the labour market relates to gender differences. A significant part of these differences are caused by: the existence of a patriarchal social system; the segregation of the labour market; gender discrimination. This paper attempts to examine women’s employment and unemployment patterns on the Romanian labour market based on a series of statistical data that has been collected and reviewed, while highlighting the main factors that shape the current situation of the Romanian labour market. As regards the employment rate, the gender difference in Romania falls within the limits of that recorded for most EU countries (the employment rate is higher for the male than female population). On the contrary, the unemployment rate is reversed (higher unemployment rate in male than female population).

Suggested Citation

  • Steliac Nela, 2015. "Classification Of Eu Countries In Terms Of The Evolution Of The Ghg Indicator Using Cluster Analysis," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3, pages 42-50, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2015:v:3:p:42-50
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2015-03/07_Steliac%20Nela.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcel Romanescu & Amelia Georgiana Boncea & Cecilia Irina Răbonțiu, 2008. "Equal Opportunities in Romania," Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics, University of Petrosani, Romania, vol. 8(2), pages 183-192.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2015:v:3:p:42-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.