IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Le poids des coauteurs

  • Marc Deschamps

This paper presents a critical appraisal of the approach used by the jury of the 2007- 2008 concours d?agrégation en sciences économiques as regards the evaluation of papers written in coauthorship. The agrégation is a centralized academic hiring procedure through which professors of economics are selected in France. We will demonstrate that no natural method exists in this domain. Consequently, we suggest to either abandon the idea that coauthorship has a particular value, or to choose a procedure, upon which the economists? community has agreed by consensus. This critical assessment might also be of interest for the evaluation of papers done in co-authorship by law researchers.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: free

File URL:
Download Restriction: free

Article provided by De Boeck Université in its journal Revue internationale de droit économique.

Volume (Year): t. XXIII, 4 (2009)
Issue (Month): 4 ()
Pages: 451-463

in new window

Handle: RePEc:cai:riddbu:ride_234_0451
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:riddbu:ride_234_0451. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.