IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Europe(s) sociales, convergence et compétition

Listed author(s):
  • Tito Boeri
  • Simona Baldi

Social policy is often considered the key element of European identity. Should it however be one for all? A common taxonomy refer to four distinct social Europe(s): Nordic, Anglo-Saxon, Continental and Mediterranean. It has lost some of its capacity to explain cross-country differences in the social policy mix. There is a mild convergence in levels, in the size of social Europes, while countries are still different in tem of composition of social policy expenditure. Activism in reforming social policy institutions increased since 1996, notably in the convergence of EMU. European harmonisation in social policy institutions can not be justified by the presence of economies of scale or of spillovers across jurisdictions. Performances of social welfare system appear better in the small EU countries. So, the EU-level decisions making should not impose a harmonisation of the different social Europe but promote exchanges of information and let the different social systems compete.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: free

File URL:
Download Restriction: free

Article provided by Dalloz in its journal Revue d'économie politique.

Volume (Year): 115 (2005)
Issue (Month): 6 ()
Pages: 705-719

in new window

Handle: RePEc:cai:repdal:redp_156_0705
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:repdal:redp_156_0705. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.