IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Mérite et justice

  • Amartya Sen
  • Maxime Parodi
Registered author(s):

    The rewarding of merit and the very concept of merit itself depend on the way we see a good society and the criteria we invoke to assess the successes and failures of societies. The « incentive view » of merit competes with the view of merit based on « action propriety ». The presence of inequality and others drawbacks can lead to some psychological tension, especially since the rewarding of merit is not directly valued under the incentive approach. Even though the incentive-based argument for rewarding merit tends to be, in principle, accepted as the main justification for such a reward system, the main interpretations of the meritocracy are unnecessary and inconsistent with the incentive approach. The common additional features include: (1) confounding merit of actions with that of persons (and possibly of groups of people), (2) overlooking the instrumental nature of the incentive argument and seeing the rewards of merit as intrinsic entitlements or deserts, and (3) ad hoc exclusion of distributional concerns from the objective function in terms of which merit is characterized. JEL Classification: D63, I2, I3.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free

    Article provided by Presses de Sciences-Po in its journal Revue de l'OFCE.

    Volume (Year): n° 102 (2007)
    Issue (Month): 3 ()
    Pages: 467-481

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:cai:reofsp:reof_102_0467
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:reofsp:reof_102_0467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.