IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cai/recosp/reco_pr2_0084.html

Ce que le vote par approbation révèle des préférences des électeurs français

Author

Listed:
  • Isabelle Lebon
  • Antoinette Baujard
  • Frédéric Gavrel
  • Herrade Igersheim
  • Jean-François Laslier

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to determine a distribution along a political axis of the candidates for the 2012 French presidential election on the basis of the opinions of voters, rather than on a priori ideological positions.?To do so, experimental data from a voting experiment on approval voting are used.?The obtained endogenous axis representative of the political landscape corresponds to a fairly standard left-right axis.?However, a more precise analysis of the behavior of voters questions the unimodality assumption of political preferences usually associated with this structure.?Voters often simultaneously approve candidates on both sides of the political spectrum but without supporting intermediary candidates on the axis; besides, this attitude is more common among men than women. Classification JEL : C93, D72.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabelle Lebon & Antoinette Baujard & Frédéric Gavrel & Herrade Igersheim & Jean-François Laslier, 2017. "Ce que le vote par approbation révèle des préférences des électeurs français," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 68(6), pages 1063-1076.
  • Handle: RePEc:cai:recosp:reco_pr2_0084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=RECO_PR2_0084
    Download Restriction: free

    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/revue-economique-2017-6-page-1063.htm
    Download Restriction: free
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antoinette Baujard & Isabelle Lebon, 2025. "Retelling the Story of the 2017 French Presidential Election: The contribution of Approval Voting," Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 65-86, November.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C93 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Field Experiments
    • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:recosp:reco_pr2_0084. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cairn.info/revue-economique.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.