IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Une évaluation expérimentale des modes électroniques de résolution des litiges

Listed author(s):
  • Yannick Gabuthy
  • Nicolas Jacquemet

The development of the Internet and electronic commerce has resulted in the emergence of Online Dispute Resolution. The aim of the paper is to evaluate experimentally the economic performance of an innovative settlement method, called automated negotiation, which inserts the technology as a third party in the conflicts: the parties’ proposals are received and evaluated by an automated algorithm which provides a convergence mechanism in the bargaining process and gives a decision according to a given settlement rule. The results show that the parties are incited to exploit strategically the convergence mechanism in order to increase their payoffs, which limit the ability of the procedure to generate efficiency. However, when the threat that a disagreement occurs is more credible (due to a deeper conflict), this perverse effect is reduced since the parties are incited to adopt a more concessionary behavior. The implications of these results are then used to discuss the potential role of public regulation and reputation mechanisms in virtual world. Classification JEL : C78, C91, D74, K41.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: free

File URL:
Download Restriction: free

Article provided by Presses de Sciences-Po in its journal Revue économique.

Volume (Year): 58 (2007)
Issue (Month): 6 ()
Pages: 1309-1330

in new window

Handle: RePEc:cai:recosp:reco_586_1309
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:recosp:reco_586_1309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.