IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Une évaluation expérimentale des modes électroniques de résolution des litiges


  • Yannick Gabuthy
  • Nicolas Jacquemet


The development of the Internet and electronic commerce has resulted in the emergence of Online Dispute Resolution. The aim of the paper is to evaluate experimentally the economic performance of an innovative settlement method, called automated negotiation, which inserts the technology as a third party in the conflicts: the parties’ proposals are received and evaluated by an automated algorithm which provides a convergence mechanism in the bargaining process and gives a decision according to a given settlement rule. The results show that the parties are incited to exploit strategically the convergence mechanism in order to increase their payoffs, which limit the ability of the procedure to generate efficiency. However, when the threat that a disagreement occurs is more credible (due to a deeper conflict), this perverse effect is reduced since the parties are incited to adopt a more concessionary behavior. The implications of these results are then used to discuss the potential role of public regulation and reputation mechanisms in virtual world. Classification JEL : C78, C91, D74, K41.

Suggested Citation

  • Yannick Gabuthy & Nicolas Jacquemet, 2007. "Une évaluation expérimentale des modes électroniques de résolution des litiges," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 58(6), pages 1309-1330.
  • Handle: RePEc:cai:recosp:reco_586_1309

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free

    Other versions of this item:


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. repec:hal:wpaper:halshs-00746617 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Yannick Gabuthy & Nicolas Jacquemet, 2013. "Analyse économique du droit et méthode expérimentale," Economie & Prévision, La Documentation Française, vol. 0(1), pages 121-145.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C78 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Bargaining Theory; Matching Theory
    • C91 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
    • D74 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Alliances; Revolutions
    • K41 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Litigation Process


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:recosp:reco_586_1309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.