IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cai/finpug/fina_362_0067.html

On Path-Dependent Structured Funds: Complexity Does Not Always Pay (Asian versus Average Performance Funds)

Author

Listed:
  • Philippe Bertrand
  • Jean-Luc Prigent

Abstract

As emphasized by the U.S. Dodd-Frank Act and the European MiFID directive, financial institutions are required to ?categorise their clients and assess their suitability for each type of investment product.? In this framework, this paper examines several standard financial structured products whose performances are based on smoothing the return of an underlying risky asset and providing a guarantee at maturity. We use various criteria such as probabilities of providing merely the guarantee at maturity and Kappa measures. Surprisingly, our study reveals that funds based on averages of calls generally do better than Asian funds.

Suggested Citation

  • Philippe Bertrand & Jean-Luc Prigent, 2015. "On Path-Dependent Structured Funds: Complexity Does Not Always Pay (Asian versus Average Performance Funds)," Finance, Presses universitaires de Grenoble, vol. 36(2), pages 67-105.
    • Handle: RePEc:cai:finpug:fina_362_0067
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=FINA_362_0067
    Download Restriction: free
    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/revue-finance-2015-2-page-67.htm
    Download Restriction: free
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bertrand, Philippe & Prigent, Jean-luc, 2019. "On the optimality of path-dependent structured funds: The cost of standardization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(1), pages 333-350.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G13 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Contingent Pricing; Futures Pricing
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • D03 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:finpug:fina_362_0067. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cairn.info/revue-finance.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.