IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnljfs/v55y2009i12id63-2009-jfs.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differences in top-soil features between beech-mixture and Norway spruce forests of the Šumava Mts

Author

Listed:
  • K. Matějka

    (IDS, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • J. Starý

    (Institute of soil biology, Biological centre AS CR, České Budějovice, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Top-soil samples were taken from four mountain forest ecosystems in the Bohemian Forest to compare the processes in European beech-mixture (Fs) and Norway spruce (Pa) dominating ecosystems. Selected plots can be grouped into two types of forest ecosystems which are conditioned by position on the natural altitudinal gradient. Several chemical features (content of organic matter, properties of humic and fulvic acids, releasable P, Ca, Mg, Fe and Al content) were compared with the species structure of oribatid mite communities in the same samples. Strict differences between both ecosystem types were discovered. Statistically significant differences were detected in Mg content (0.42 mg/g in Fs ecosystems compared to 0.30 mg/g in Pa ecosystems) and in organic matter quality (the ratio of carbon content in humic acids to carbon content in total humus acids was 0.53 in Fs ecosystems and 0.66 in Pa ecosystems) and quantity (e.g. content of humic acid carbon was 59 and 86 mg/g in Fs and Pa ecosystems, respectively). Different dynamics of organic matter decomposition and nutrient movement lead to some opposite correlations among the soil chemical features: correlation between total ash and soluble ash (r = +0.96 and -0.86 in the Fs and Pa ecosystems, respectively) and total ash - P content correlation (r = +0.76 and -0.92 in the Fs and Pa ecosystems, respectively) can be mentioned as examples. The oribatid mite communities are markedly distinct in both ecosystem types, although parameters of species diversity and abundance are similar. Different correlations were revealed between the parameters of mite community structure (e.g. species diversity and total mite abundance) and top-soil chemical features. The correlation structure is different in both ecosystem types. It indicates differences in leading variables determining the oribatid community structure in the beech mixture ecosystem or in the Norway spruce one.

Suggested Citation

  • K. Matějka & J. Starý, 2009. "Differences in top-soil features between beech-mixture and Norway spruce forests of the Šumava Mts," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(12), pages 540-555.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnljfs:v:55:y:2009:i:12:id:63-2009-jfs
    DOI: 10.17221/63/2009-JFS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/63/2009-JFS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/63/2009-JFS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/63/2009-JFS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Viewegh & A. Kusbach & M. Mikeska, 2003. "Czech forest ecosystem classification," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 49(2), pages 74-82.
    2. S. Vacek & V. Podrázský & K. Matějka, 2006. "Dynamics of the health status of forest stands and its prediction on research plots in the Šumava Mts," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 52(10), pages 457-473.
    3. T. Fabiánek & L. Menšík & I. Tomášková & J. Kulhavý, 2009. "Effects of spruce, beech and mixed commercial stand on humus conditions of forest soils," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(3), pages 119-126.
    4. M. Remeš & J. Kulhavý, 2009. "Dissolved organic carbon concentrations under conditions of different forestcomposition," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(5), pages 201-207.
    5. M. Svoboda, 2003. "Biological activity, nitrogen dynamics, and chemical characteristics of forest soils in the Šumava national park," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 49(7), pages 302-312.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tomáš Čihák & Monika Vejpustková, 2023. "Comparison of nutrient and carbon stocks in the aboveground biomass of mature silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst) stands," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(8), pages 334-347.
    2. J. Novák & D. Dušek & M. Slodičák, 2014. "Quantity and quality of litterfall in young oak stands," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(6), pages 219-225.
    3. E. Kula & A. Pešlová & P. Martinek, 2012. "Effects of nitrogen on growth properties and phenology of silver birch (Betula pendula Roth)," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 58(9), pages 391-399.
    4. O. Špulák, 2012. "Aboveground biomass and nutrients in an 18-years-old stand of blue spruce (Picea pungens Engelm.) as a substitute tree species," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 58(6), pages 253-264.
    5. Pavel Samec & Aleš Kučera & Pavel Tuček, 2014. "Fluctuations in the properties of forest soils in the Central European highlands (Czech Republic)," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 9(4), pages 201-213.
    6. P. Šamonil, 2007. "Uniqueness of limestone soil-forming substrate in the forest ecosystem classification," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 53(4), pages 149-161.
    7. K. Malík & J. Remeš & S. Vacek & V. Štícha, 2014. "Development and dynamics of mountain spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karsten) stand regeneration," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(2), pages 61-69.
    8. Jakub ČERNÝ & Jan KREJZA & Radek POKORNÝ & Pavel BEDNÁŘ, 2018. "LaiPen LP 100 - a new device for estimating forest ecosystem leaf area index compared to the etalon: A methodologic case study," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(11), pages 455-468.
    9. Luboš Borůvka & Radim Vašát & Vít Šrámek & Kateřina Neudertová Hellebrandová & Věra Fadrhonsová & Milan Sáňka & Lenka Pavlů & Ondřej Sáňka & Oldřich Vacek & Karel Němeček & Shahin Nozari & Vincent Yaw, 2022. "Predictors for digital mapping of forest soil organic carbon stocks in different types of landscape," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 17(2), pages 69-79.
    10. V. Mansfeld, 2011. "Norway spruce in forest ecosystems of the Czech Republic in relation to different forest site conditions," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 57(11), pages 514-522.
    11. O. Holuša & J. Holuša, 2008. "Characteristics of 3rd (Querci-fageta s. lat.) and 4th (Fageta (abietis) s. lat.) vegetation tiers of north-eastern Moravia and Silesia (Czech Republic)," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 54(10), pages 439-451.
    12. Ondřej SCHÖNFELDER & Aleš ZEIDLER & Vlastimil BORŮVKA & Lukáš BÍLEK, 2017. "Influence of site conditions and silvicultural practice on the wood density of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) - a case study from the Doksy locality, Czech Republic," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(10), pages 457-462.
    13. K. Matějka & J. Leugner & V. Krpeš, 2014. "Phenotype features in juvenile populations of Picea abies and their growth," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(3), pages 96-108.
    14. repec:caa:jnljfs:v:preprint:id:107-2023-jfs is not listed on IDEAS
    15. J. Jonczak & A. Parzych, 2012. "Impact of Scots pine admixture in European beech stand on dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen leaching from organic and humic horizons of Dystric Arenosols in Northern Poland," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 58(6), pages 278-286.
    16. O. Švec & L. Bílek & J. Remeš & Z. Vacek, 2015. "Analysis of operational approach during forest transformation in Klokočná Range, Central Bohemia," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(4), pages 148-155.
    17. J. Möllerová & J. Viewegh, 2005. "Vegetation of the Nature Reserve Voskop (Protected Landscape Area Český kras) and possible trends of its development," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 51(SpecialIs), pages 24-26.
    18. S. Střeštík & P. Šamonil, 2006. "Ecological valence of expanding European ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) in the Bohemian Karst (Czech Republic)," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 52(7), pages 293-305.
    19. O. Špulák & D. Kacálek, 2016. "Below-canopy and topsoil temperatures in young Norway spruce and Carpathian birch stands compared to gaps in the mountains," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(10), pages 441-451.
    20. Zdeněk Vacek & Ivana Tomášková & Zdeněk Fuchs & Václav Šimůnek & Stanislav Vacek & Jan Cukor & Lukáš Bílek & Josef Gallo & Karel Zlatuška & Martin Duchan, 2025. "Impact of technical water retention on European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) resilience and growth dynamics," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 71(3), pages 124-137.
    21. B. Fedorová & J. Kadavý & Z. Adamec & M. Kneifl & R. Knott, 2016. "Response of diameter and height increment to thinning in oak-hornbeam coppice in the southeastern part of the Czech Republic," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(5), pages 229-235.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnljfs:v:55:y:2009:i:12:id:63-2009-jfs. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.