IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/brf/journl/v7y2009i4p459-484.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Empirical Analysis of the Financing Policies Adopted by Brazilian Public Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Fernando Nascimento Oliveira

    (Banco Central do Brasil e IBMEC/RJ)

  • Pedro Góes Monteiro de Oliveira

    (Starplan Ltda e IBMEC/RJ)

Abstract

The Static Tradeoff and Pecking Order models specified in Shyam-Sunder and Myers (1999) were employed to analyze the financing policies adopted by Brazilian public firms. At a first glance, it seems that both models correctly describe the way in which firms in the sample finance their investments, although the Pecking Order model explains a greater percentage of the time series variance in the debt level. But when the power to reject the alternative hypothesis of each of the two models is considered, we conclude that the adopted policy is actually of the pecking order type. The factors that influence the decision to issue debt or equity to finance cash deficits, for the firms in the sample, were also studied with the help of two nonlinear probability models of the “Probit” type. The results show that equity is issued when market conditions are favorable, and not only when there is a substantial risk of default, pointing to a pecking order policy of the “complex” type.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernando Nascimento Oliveira & Pedro Góes Monteiro de Oliveira, 2009. "An Empirical Analysis of the Financing Policies Adopted by Brazilian Public Companies," Brazilian Review of Finance, Brazilian Society of Finance, vol. 7(4), pages 459-484.
  • Handle: RePEc:brf:journl:v:7:y:2009:i:4:p:459-484
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rbfin/article/download/1340/1502
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rbfin/article/view/1340
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    capital structure; cash deficit; financial leverage; static tradeoff; pecking order;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:brf:journl:v:7:y:2009:i:4:p:459-484. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marcio Laurini (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.