IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/brc/journl/v34y2016i4p168-175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study Regarding The Assessment Of Performance Of A Public Institution In The Forestry In The Region South Muntenia

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Mihaela Ilie (Serb)

    (Valahia University of Târgoviste, Faculty of Economics, Romania)

  • Carmen Tincu (Bena)

    (Valahia University of Târgoviste, Faculty of Economics, Romania)

Abstract

Romania has a natural capital superior to many countries members of the European Union. Sustainability is the field where we can compete at the same level with any country in the European Union, provided that we work with perseverance and realism. In this article we intend to answer the following questions: „How profitable is a public institution in field of forest?”, „What measures can be taken by the public institution analysed to become profitable?”. To know the answers we analysed the financial statements of a public institution in the forestry. Thus we have noticed the non-profitability registered by it over a period of time and we proposed certain measures to overcome this critical point.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Mihaela Ilie (Serb) & Carmen Tincu (Bena), 2016. "Study Regarding The Assessment Of Performance Of A Public Institution In The Forestry In The Region South Muntenia," Management Strategies Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 34(4), pages 168-175.
    • Handle: RePEc:brc:journl:v:34:y:2016:i:4:p:168-175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.strategiimanageriale.ro/papers/160424.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    performance; income tax; the result of the exercise; the gross surplus of exploitation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:brc:journl:v:34:y:2016:i:4:p:168-175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dan MICUDA (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.univcb.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.