IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/statpp/v17y2026i2p285-322n1001.html

The U.S. Public Opinion on Gaza and Policy Implications: An Empirical Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Liu Kerry

    (Independent scholar, Australia)

Abstract

On February 4, 2025, U.S. President Trump’s proposal to take over Gaza shocked the world. This study aims to interpret the policy shift by analyzing evolving U.S. public opinion on Gaza. Using Google Trends data from September 2018 to March 2025, it constructs innovative time series variables to capture the U.S. public agenda. The analysis reveals a structural shift in public sentiment beginning in October 2023. Prior to that, opinion was largely reactive to isolated extreme events. Afterward, discourse was driven by polarized narratives: (far)-left slogans such as “Free Palestine” and “From the River to the Sea,” and far-right apocalyptic themes, proxied by interest in Jesus’ Second Coming. A parallel humanitarian layer within pro-Israel attention – captured by searches for “Israel hostages” – is also consistently significant and positively associated with the Gaza narrative. By contrast, legal–humanitarian framing (“Gaza Genocide”) and mainstream solidarity slogans (“Stand with Israel”) are generally less significant or less stable. Overall, extreme framings dominate, but hostage-related humanitarian concerns remain an important driver of attention, with implications for U.S. policy agenda. Future research should examine whether other Trump–Vance policies exhibit similar patterns.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu Kerry, 2026. "The U.S. Public Opinion on Gaza and Policy Implications: An Empirical Analysis," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 17(2), pages 285-322.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:statpp:v:17:y:2026:i:2:p:285-322:n:1001
    DOI: 10.1515/spp-2025-0029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/spp-2025-0029
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/spp-2025-0029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:statpp:v:17:y:2026:i:2:p:285-322:n:1001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyterbrill.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.