IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/sagmbi/v15y2016i4p349-361n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

LandScape: a simple method to aggregate p-values and other stochastic variables without a priori grouping

Author

Listed:
  • Wiuf Carsten
  • Schaumburg-Müller Pallesen Jonatan
  • Foldager Leslie
  • Grove Jakob

Abstract

In many areas of science it is custom to perform many, potentially millions, of tests simultaneously. To gain statistical power it is common to group tests based on a priori criteria such as predefined regions or by sliding windows. However, it is not straightforward to choose grouping criteria and the results might depend on the chosen criteria. Methods that summarize, or aggregate, test statistics or p-values, without relying on a priori criteria, are therefore desirable. We present a simple method to aggregate a sequence of stochastic variables, such as test statistics or p-values, into fewer variables without assuming a priori defined groups. We provide different ways to evaluate the significance of the aggregated variables based on theoretical considerations and resampling techniques, and show that under certain assumptions the FWER is controlled in the strong sense. Validity of the method was demonstrated using simulations and real data analyses. Our method may be a useful supplement to standard procedures relying on evaluation of test statistics individually. Moreover, by being agnostic and not relying on predefined selected regions, it might be a practical alternative to conventionally used methods of aggregation of p-values over regions. The method is implemented in Python and freely available online (through GitHub, see the Supplementary information).

Suggested Citation

  • Wiuf Carsten & Schaumburg-Müller Pallesen Jonatan & Foldager Leslie & Grove Jakob, 2016. "LandScape: a simple method to aggregate p-values and other stochastic variables without a priori grouping," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 15(4), pages 349-361, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:15:y:2016:i:4:p:349-361:n:5
    DOI: 10.1515/sagmb-2015-0085
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/sagmb-2015-0085
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/sagmb-2015-0085?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meijer Rosa J. & Krebs Thijmen J.P. & Goeman Jelle J., 2015. "A region-based multiple testing method for hypotheses ordered in space or time," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guillermo Durand & Gilles Blanchard & Pierre Neuvial & Etienne Roquain, 2020. "Post hoc false positive control for structured hypotheses," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 47(4), pages 1114-1148, December.
    2. Claude Renaux & Laura Buzdugan & Markus Kalisch & Peter Bühlmann, 2020. "Hierarchical inference for genome-wide association studies: a view on methodology with software," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 1-40, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:15:y:2016:i:4:p:349-361:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.