IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

GENOVA: Gene Overlap Analysis of GWAS Results


  • Tang Clara S.

    (Queensland Institute of Medical Research)

  • Ferreira Manuel A. R.

    (Queensland Institute of Medical Research)


In many published genome-wide association studies (GWAS), the top few strongly associated variants are often located in or near known genes. This observation raises the more general hypothesis that variants nominally associated with a phenotype are more likely to overlap genes than those not associated with a phenotype. We developed a simple approach – named GENe OVerlap Analysis (GENOVA) – to formally test this hypothesis. This approach includes two steps. First, we define largely independent groups of highly correlated SNPs (or “clumps”) and classify each clump as intersecting a gene or not. Second, we determine how strongly associated each clump is with the phenotype and use logistic regression to formally test the hypothesis that clumps associated with the phenotype are more likely to intersect genes. Simulations suggest that the power of GENOVA is affected by at least three factors: GWAS sample size, the gene boundaries used to define gene-intersecting clumps and the P-value threshold used to define phenotype-associated clumps. We applied GENOVA to results from three recent GWAS meta-analyses of height, body mass index (BMI) and waist-hip ratio (WHR) conducted by the GIANT consortium. SNPs associated with variation in height were 1.44-fold more likely to be in or near genes than SNPs not associated with height (P = 5x10-28). A weaker association was observed for BMI (1.09-fold, P = 0.008) and WHR (1.09-fold, P = 0.014). GENOVA is implemented in C++ and is freely available at

Suggested Citation

  • Tang Clara S. & Ferreira Manuel A. R., 2012. "GENOVA: Gene Overlap Analysis of GWAS Results," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:11:y:2012:i:3:n:6

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:11:y:2012:i:3:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Golla). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.