IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/rneart/v4y2005i4n8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Merchant Benefits and Public Policy towards Interchange: An Economic Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Guerin-Calvert Margaret E.

    () (Competition Policy Associates, Inc.)

  • Ordover Janusz A.

    (New York University; Competition Policy Associates, Inc.)

Abstract

We analyze the complex nature of interactions among participants in "two-sided" payments system markets, examine empirical evidence on benefits, especially merchant benefits, and re-assess the role of interchange in balancing interests and allocating costs between merchants and consumers. We conclude there are substantial potential harms to payments systems, consumers, and merchants from imposing cost-based regulation of interchange fees, particularly with network fixed costs. Competition policy, in our view, is the best prescription through government intervention under the antitrust laws or private challenges to exclusionary strategies that hamper competition to the detriment of cardholders, merchants, and competing networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Guerin-Calvert Margaret E. & Ordover Janusz A., 2005. "Merchant Benefits and Public Policy towards Interchange: An Economic Assessment," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 4(4), pages 1-31, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:rneart:v:4:y:2005:i:4:n:8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/rne.2005.4.4/rne.2005.4.4.1083/rne.2005.4.4.1083.xml?format=INT
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tosza, Katarzyna, 2009. "Payment Card Systems as an Example of two-sided Markets - a Challenge for Antitrust Authorities," MPRA Paper 23822, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:rneart:v:4:y:2005:i:4:n:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Golla). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.