IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/rlecon/v21y2025i2p561-576n1008.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Missing Window of Opportunity and Quasi-Experimental Effects of Institutional Integration: Evidence from Ukraine

Author

Listed:
  • Focacci Chiara Natalie

    (University of Oxford Institute of Population Ageing, Oxford, England)

  • Kovac Mitja

    (Department of Economic Theory and Policy, Faculty of Economics University of Ljubljana, Kardeljeva ploscad 17, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Spruk Rok

    (37663 University of Ljubljana Faculty of Economics , Ljubljana, Slovenia)

Abstract

We examine the contribution of institutional integration to a country’s institutional capacity. To this end, we examine the effects of remaining outside of the European integration process for 28 Ukrainian provinces in the period 1996–2020. We construct novel, machine-learning supported subnational estimates of institutional capacity and quality for Ukraine and for central and eastern European countries that have completed institutional integration. Based on the latent residual component extraction of institutional quality from the existing governance indicators, we use Bayesian posterior analysis under non-informative objective prior function to construct institutional quality indicators from more than 1.8 million randomly sequenced samples across Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations. By comparing the residualized institutional quality trajectories of Ukrainian provinces with their central and eastern European peers that were admitted to the European Union in 2004 and after, we assess the institutional quality cost of failing to institutionally integrate with the EU. Based on the large-scale synthetic control and difference-in-differences analysis, we find evidence of large-scale negative institutional quality and capacity effects of missing the European integration path such as heightened political instability and rampant deterioration of the rule of law and control of corruption. The statistical significance of the estimated effects is evaluated across a comprehensive placebo simulation with more than 34 billion placebo averages for each institutional quality outcome.

Suggested Citation

  • Focacci Chiara Natalie & Kovac Mitja & Spruk Rok, 2025. "The Missing Window of Opportunity and Quasi-Experimental Effects of Institutional Integration: Evidence from Ukraine," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 21(2), pages 561-576.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:rlecon:v:21:y:2025:i:2:p:561-576:n:1008
    DOI: 10.1515/rle-2024-0056
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2024-0056
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/rle-2024-0056?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C14 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General
    • C23 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models
    • O19 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - International Linkages to Development; Role of International Organizations
    • O43 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Institutions and Growth
    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:rlecon:v:21:y:2025:i:2:p:561-576:n:1008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyterbrill.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.