IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/rlecon/v13y2017i2p25n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shrinkage Estimation in the Adjudication of Civil Damage Claims

Author

Listed:
  • Bavli Hillel J.

    (Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA)

  • Chen Yang

    (Department of Statistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA)

Abstract

Recent papers have highlighted the use of claim aggregation as a tool for reducing the unpredictability of legal outcomes. Specifically, it has been argued that sampling methods can be used in the class action context, and comparable-case guidance – information regarding awards in comparable cases as guidance for determining damage awards – can be used in the individual-claim context, to reduce variability and improve the accuracy of awards. In this paper, we examine a third form of claim aggregation based on a statistical method called “shrinkage estimation,” which is used to aggregate information and thereby improve estimation. We examine the conditions under which “shrinkage” can improve the accuracy of damage awards, and we apply it to gain a deeper understanding of the benefits and limitations of claim aggregation in the sampling and comparable-case guidance contexts with respect to accuracy.

Suggested Citation

  • Bavli Hillel J. & Chen Yang, 2017. "Shrinkage Estimation in the Adjudication of Civil Damage Claims," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 13(2), pages 1-25, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:rlecon:v:13:y:2017:i:2:p:25:n:3
    DOI: 10.1515/rle-2015-0010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2015-0010
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/rle-2015-0010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:rlecon:v:13:y:2017:i:2:p:25:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.