IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/mcmeap/v11y2005i1p83-92n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On global sensitivity analysis of quasi-Monte Carlo algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Sobol´ I.M.

    (1. Institute for Mathematical Modelling of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 4 Miusskaya Square, Moscow 125047, Russia.)

  • Kucherenko S.S.

    (2. Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, UK)

Abstract

Different Quasi-Monte Carlo algorithms corresponding to the same Monte Carlo algorithm are considered. Even in the case when their constructive dimensions are equal and the same quasi-random points are used, the efficiencies of these algorithms may differ. Global sensitivity analysis provides an insight into this situation. As a model problem two well-known approximations of a Wiener integral are considered: the standard one and the Brownian bridge. The advantage of the Brownian bridge is confirmed.

Suggested Citation

  • Sobol´ I.M. & Kucherenko S.S., 2005. "On global sensitivity analysis of quasi-Monte Carlo algorithms," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 83-92, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:mcmeap:v:11:y:2005:i:1:p:83-92:n:4
    DOI: 10.1515/1569396054027274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/1569396054027274
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/1569396054027274?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Weirs, V. Gregory & Kamm, James R. & Swiler, Laura P. & Tarantola, Stefano & Ratto, Marco & Adams, Brian M. & Rider, William J. & Eldred, Michael S., 2012. "Sensitivity analysis techniques applied to a system of hyperbolic conservation laws," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 157-170.
    2. Julien Hok & Sergei Kucherenko, 2021. "Pricing and Risk Analysis in Hyperbolic Local Volatility Model with Quasi Monte Carlo," Papers 2106.08421, arXiv.org.
    3. Xiaoyan Zhu & Way Kuo, 2014. "Importance measures in reliability and mathematical programming," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 212(1), pages 241-267, January.
    4. Annoni, Paola & Bruggemann, Rainer & Saltelli, Andrea, 2012. "Random and quasi-random designs in variance-based sensitivity analysis for partially ordered sets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 184-189.
    5. Céline Diebold, 2022. "How Meaningful is the Elite Quality Index Ranking?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 137-170, August.
    6. Song, Shufang & Zhou, Tong & Wang, Lu & Kucherenko, Sergei & Lu, Zhenzhou, 2019. "Derivative-based new upper bound of Sobol’ sensitivity measure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 142-148.
    7. Mirko Ginocchi & Ferdinanda Ponci & Antonello Monti, 2021. "Sensitivity Analysis and Power Systems: Can We Bridge the Gap? A Review and a Guide to Getting Started," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-59, December.
    8. Zentner, Irmela & Tarantola, Stefano & de Rocquigny, E., 2011. "Sensitivity analysis for reliable design verification of nuclear turbosets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 391-397.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:mcmeap:v:11:y:2005:i:1:p:83-92:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.