IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/jqsprt/v6y2010i3n13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scoring Variables and Judge Bias in United States Dressage Competitions

Author

Listed:
  • Diaz Ana E.

    (Dupont)

  • Johnston Mary S.

    (@@@@)

  • Lucitti Jennifer

    (University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill)

  • Neckameyer Wendi S.

    (Saint Louis University School of Medicine)

  • Moran Katy M.

    (@@@@)

Abstract

Dressage is an Olympic equestrian discipline with rules governed by The Fédération Equestre Internationale (FEI). After questions arose regarding dressage scoring during the 2008 Olympics, the FEI undertook studies of dressage scoring at international equestrian competitions in Europe. These studies included investigations of scoring scales and judging bias. Based on those results, the FEI recommended the use of statistics to improve the consistency of judge training in dressage competition. The authors performed a statistical analysis of dressage scores earned by riders in the United States. This work demonstrates the lack of consistency in judging in the United States. This is the first published study that looks at U.S. dressage results. It includes a very large data set considered representative of the population of riders in the U.S. Dressage is a subjectively judged sport. The final score, not the class placing, is of greatest importance when assessing rider results. The authors show how mainstream statistical tools can identify factors impacting the final dressage score. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to demonstrate the existence of key variables which impact scores. The analysis shows there are variations in scoring patterns by horse breed, as well as the existence of high-scoring and low-scoring judges. Finally, the analysis shows that there are increased standard deviations at the "extremes" of the judging scale. This would indicate there is variability in interpretation of scoring at the upper and lower ends of the scoring scale. Analysis of Means (ANOM) identified five judges whose scores were statistically different than the grand average scores.

Suggested Citation

  • Diaz Ana E. & Johnston Mary S. & Lucitti Jennifer & Neckameyer Wendi S. & Moran Katy M., 2010. "Scoring Variables and Judge Bias in United States Dressage Competitions," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 6(3), pages 1-21, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:6:y:2010:i:3:n:13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/jqas.2010.6.3/jqas.2010.6.3.1251/jqas.2010.6.3.1251.xml?format=INT
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:6:y:2010:i:3:n:13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Golla). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.