IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/jqsprt/v21y2025i3p237-252n1003.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

FIVB ranking: misstep in the right direction

Author

Listed:
  • Tenni Salma

    (INRS and McGill, Quebec, Canada)

  • Gomes de Pinho Zanco Daniel

    (Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique, Montreal, Canada)

  • Szczecinski Leszek

    (Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique, Montreal, Canada)

Abstract

This work presents and evaluates the ranking algorithm that has been used by Fédération Internationale de Volleyball (FIVB) since 2020. The prominent feature of the FIVB ranking is the use of the probabilistic model, which explicitly calculates the probabilities of the future matches results using the estimated teams’ strengths. Such explicit modeling is new in the context of official sport rankings, especially for multi-level outcomes, and we study the optimality of its parameters using both analytical and numerical methods. We conclude that from the modeling perspective, the current thresholds fit well the data but adding the home-field advantage (HFA) would be beneficial. Regarding the algorithm itself, we explain the rationale behind the approximations currently used and show a simple method to find new parameters (numerical score) which improve the performance. We also show that the weighting of the match results is counterproductive.

Suggested Citation

  • Tenni Salma & Gomes de Pinho Zanco Daniel & Szczecinski Leszek, 2025. "FIVB ranking: misstep in the right direction," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 21(3), pages 237-252.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:21:y:2025:i:3:p:237-252:n:1003
    DOI: 10.1515/jqas-2024-0128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jqas-2024-0128
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jqas-2024-0128?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:21:y:2025:i:3:p:237-252:n:1003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyterbrill.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.