IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/jqsprt/v18y2022i4p215-226n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling Australian Rules Football as spatial systems with pairwise comparisons

Author

Listed:
  • Andreacchio Anton
  • Bean Nigel
  • Mitchell Lewis

    (School of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, 5005, Adelaide, Australia)

Abstract

Statistical analysis in competitive sport is an important tool for developing strategy and seeking competitive advantages. However, for complex team sports such as Australian Rules Football, major limitations occur when using possession event data for game analysis. First, focusing on counting possession events does not capture the impact of off-the-ball actions such as ground positioning of other players. Second, it is difficult to determine the extent that an event is due to either team’s relative proficiency or skill. Third, there is limited possession event data available from each match and modelling efforts often have low statistical power. Here we reinterpret event data into positional systems and utilise pairwise performance metrics to understand the relative team proficiency in each of these states. These metrics can then be used to construct transition probabilities between states for future games, and ultimately, absorbing probabilities of goal states. Our approach effectively predicts match outcomes using team ratings for forward, midfield and defensive systems and is sufficiently interpretable to support strategic decision-making by coaching departments in the Australian Football League (AFL).

Suggested Citation

  • Andreacchio Anton & Bean Nigel & Mitchell Lewis, 2022. "Modelling Australian Rules Football as spatial systems with pairwise comparisons," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 18(4), pages 215-226, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:18:y:2022:i:4:p:215-226:n:1
    DOI: 10.1515/jqas-2021-0035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jqas-2021-0035
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jqas-2021-0035?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:18:y:2022:i:4:p:215-226:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.