IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/jqsprt/v15y2019i3p203-211n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal shot selection strategies for the NBA

Author

Listed:
  • Fichman Mark

    (Carnegie Mellon University, Tepper School of Business, Pittsburgh, PA, USA)

  • O’Brien John Robert

    (Carnegie Mellon University, Tepper School of Business, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3815, USA, Tel.: 4122683315, e-mail: obrien.john@gmail.com)

Abstract

In this paper we conduct an equilibrium analysis of the 2015–2016 NBA record breaking season culminating in the dramatic final series upset produced by the Cleveland Cavaliers (CLE) over the Golden State Warriors (GSW). A Stackelberg equilibrium (Conitzer and Sandholm 2006) is constructed for each pair of NBA teams, as a pair of mixed offensive strategies defined over 2- and 3-point shot court locations. The first component corresponds to Team A’s offensive strategy playing against team B’s defense, and the second component is team B’s offensive strategy playing against team A’s defense. The results support the following insights. First, the results suggest that future NBA 3-point averages are headed higher to 37.9%, in contrast with current regular and playoff season averages for the 2015–2016 of 28.6% and 30.9%, respectively. Second, the results provide a means for evaluating the influence of an opposing team’s defense upon offensive strategy. Third, the results provide a strategic interpretation of the final NBA 2015–2016 playoff series where CLE upset GSW. GSW started close to their predicted strategy and then almost monotonically shifted further away whereas CLE moved closer to their predicted strategy. Realized outcomes correlate with these strategic trends.

Suggested Citation

  • Fichman Mark & O’Brien John Robert, 2019. "Optimal shot selection strategies for the NBA," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 15(3), pages 203-211, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:15:y:2019:i:3:p:203-211:n:2
    DOI: 10.1515/jqas-2017-0113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jqas-2017-0113
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jqas-2017-0113?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:15:y:2019:i:3:p:203-211:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.