IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Three Arguments Against Menger's Suggested Aristotelianism


  • Crespo Ricardo F.

    (Universidad Austral & Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas)


Specialists often maintain that Menger has been strongly influenced by Aristotles thought ideas.This paper shows that although using Aristotles categories and general framework there are some issues in which Mengers conclusions differs from Aristotles.This hint out that Mengers knowledge of Aristotles ideas was not sufficiently deep and precise so as to completely capture its very spirit.Section two lays out the differences between Mengers conception of theoretical science applied to economics and Aristotles conception of economics as a practical science.Section three maintains that the Mengerian claim about the methodological absurdity of empirically testing the conclusions of exact research is not genuinely Aristotelian.Section four deals with the issue of Mengers concept of organic social institutions showing its differences visà- vis an Aristotelian position.Les spécialistes soutiennent souvent que Menger a été fortement influencé par la pensée dAristote.Cet article montre que, bien quempruntant les catégories et la structure générale dAristote, certaines des conclusions de Menger diffèrent de celles dAristote.Larticle suggère que la connaissance quavait Menger des idées dAristote nétait pas suffisamment approfondie et précise pour en appréhender le sens plein.La section deux présente les différences entre la conception de la science théorique présente dans léconomique de Menger et la conception aristotélicienne de léconomie comme une science pratique.La troisième section soutient que largument de Menger au sujet de labsurdité méthodologique des tests empiriques des conclusions de la recherche exacte nest pas réellement aristotélicien. La section quatre aborde la question des institutions sociales organiques chez Menger et montre ses différences vis-à-vis de la position aristotélicienne.

Suggested Citation

  • Crespo Ricardo F., 2003. "Three Arguments Against Menger's Suggested Aristotelianism," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:jeehcn:v:13:y:2003:i:1:n:3

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Edward J. Kane & Berry Wilson, 1998. "A contracting-theory intepretation of the origins of Federal deposit insurance," Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, issue Aug, pages 573-595.
    2. Milton Friedman & Anna J. Schwartz, 1987. "Has Government Any Role in Money?," NBER Chapters,in: Money in Historical Perspective, pages 289-314 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Repullo, Rafael, 2000. "Who Should Act as Lender of Last Resort? An Incomplete Contracts Model," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 32(3), pages 580-605, August.
    4. Grossman, Richard S, 2001. "Double Liability and Bank Risk Taking," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 33(2), pages 143-159, May.
    5. Sleet, Christopher & Smith, Bruce D, 2000. "Deposit Insurance and Lender-of-Last-Resort Functions," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 32(3), pages 518-575, August.
    6. Cowen, Tyler & Kroszner, Randall, 1989. "Scottish Banking before 1845: A Model for Laissez-Faire?," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 21(2), pages 221-231, May.
    7. Agnès Quéron & Bruno Séjourné & Sylvette Vernet, 1997. "Comportements d'épargne dans les six grands pays en 1996," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 43(5), pages 233-244.
    8. Douglas W. Diamond & Philip H. Dybvig, 2000. "Bank runs, deposit insurance, and liquidity," Quarterly Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, issue Win, pages 14-23.
    9. White, Lawrence H, 1990. "Scottish Banking and the Legal Restrictions Theory: A Closer Look," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 22(4), pages 526-536, November.
    10. Winton, Andrew, 1993. " Limitation of Liability and the Ownership Structure of the Firm," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 48(2), pages 487-512, June.
    11. R.A. Bryer, 1997. "The Mercantile Laws Commission of 1854 and the Political Economy of Limited Liability," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 50(1), pages 37-56, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jeehcn:v:13:y:2003:i:1:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Golla). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.