IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Free Banking Theory and Theoreticians: A comment on Le Maux

Listed author(s):
  • Hülsmann Jörg Guido

    (Université de l’Etat de New York à Buffalo & Ludwig von Mises Institute)

Registered author(s):

    Cette réaction est suscitée par larticle de Laurent Le Maux, récemment publié dans ce Journal. Le Maux affirme que Ludwig von Mises était le défenseur dun système de réserves fractionnaires et un précurseur des économistes contemporains partisans des réserves fractionnaires (tels Dowd, Selgin, White). Nous critiquons la manière dont Le Maux utilise la littérature ancienne dans ce domaine, et nous montrons quil nest pas suffisamment au fait des travaux de Mises et des problèmes qui divisent les défenseurs et les opposants du système de réserves fractionnaires. Les écrits de Ludwig von Mises fournissent la preuve accablante quil était, et il le disait lui-même, un économiste qui développait lapproche de la Currency School dans le domaine des problèmes bancaires.This paper takes issue with an article by Laurent Le Maux that recently appeared in this journal. Le Maux claims that Ludwig von Mises was an advocate of fractional-reserve banking and a precursor of presentday economists defending fractional reserves (e.g., Dowd, Selgin, White). We criticise Le Mauxs treatment of previous literature in the field, and show that he is insufficiently acquainted with Mises work and with the problems that divide advocates and opponents of fractional reserves. Ludwig von Mises writings provide overwhelming evidence that he was, and saw himself as, an economist who developed the approach of the Currency School toward problems of banking.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by De Gruyter in its journal Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines.

    Volume (Year): 10 (2000)
    Issue (Month): 1 (March)
    Pages: 1-13

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:bpj:jeehcn:v:10:y:2000:i:1:n:5
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jeehcn:v:10:y:2000:i:1:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Golla)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.