IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Free Banking Theory and Theoreticians: A comment on Le Maux


  • Hülsmann Jörg Guido

    (Université de l’Etat de New York à Buffalo & Ludwig von Mises Institute)


Cette réaction est suscitée par larticle de Laurent Le Maux, récemment publié dans ce Journal. Le Maux affirme que Ludwig von Mises était le défenseur dun système de réserves fractionnaires et un précurseur des économistes contemporains partisans des réserves fractionnaires (tels Dowd, Selgin, White). Nous critiquons la manière dont Le Maux utilise la littérature ancienne dans ce domaine, et nous montrons quil nest pas suffisamment au fait des travaux de Mises et des problèmes qui divisent les défenseurs et les opposants du système de réserves fractionnaires. Les écrits de Ludwig von Mises fournissent la preuve accablante quil était, et il le disait lui-même, un économiste qui développait lapproche de la Currency School dans le domaine des problèmes bancaires.This paper takes issue with an article by Laurent Le Maux that recently appeared in this journal. Le Maux claims that Ludwig von Mises was an advocate of fractional-reserve banking and a precursor of presentday economists defending fractional reserves (e.g., Dowd, Selgin, White). We criticise Le Mauxs treatment of previous literature in the field, and show that he is insufficiently acquainted with Mises work and with the problems that divide advocates and opponents of fractional reserves. Ludwig von Mises writings provide overwhelming evidence that he was, and saw himself as, an economist who developed the approach of the Currency School toward problems of banking.

Suggested Citation

  • Hülsmann Jörg Guido, 2000. "Free Banking Theory and Theoreticians: A comment on Le Maux," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:jeehcn:v:10:y:2000:i:1:n:5

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jeehcn:v:10:y:2000:i:1:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Golla). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.