IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/fhecpo/v18y2015i2p151-168n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Could Improving Choice and Competition in Medicare Advantage be the Future of Medicare?

Author

Listed:
  • Rivlin Alice M.
  • Daniel Willem

    (Brookings Institution, Economic Studies, 1775 Massachusetts Ave, Washington DC, USA)

Abstract

About 30 percent of Medicare beneficiaries enroll in private Medicare Advantage (MA) plans but do so at a relatively high-cost. This paper explores the advantages and challenges of introducing competitive bidding among MA plans (Plan One) or among MA plans and Fee-for-Service (Plan Two or Premium Support). We conclude that competitive bidding could reduce the cost of Medicare, especially in densely populated urban areas. However, there would be serious challenges in rural areas and risk adjustment methodology would have to be substantially improved. In Plan Two, sicker beneficiaries might move to Fee-for-Service and beneficiaries might have to pay more to stay with a preferred provider or broader network. If these problems are addressed, we believe that premium support can be a meaningful improvement to the MA program.

Suggested Citation

  • Rivlin Alice M. & Daniel Willem, 2015. "Could Improving Choice and Competition in Medicare Advantage be the Future of Medicare?," Forum for Health Economics & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 18(2), pages 151-168, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:fhecpo:v:18:y:2015:i:2:p:151-168:n:5
    DOI: 10.1515/fhep-2015-0046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/fhep-2015-0046
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/fhep-2015-0046?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:fhecpo:v:18:y:2015:i:2:p:151-168:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.