IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/bjafio/v23y2025i1p17-33n1003.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Conjectural Variations Approach to Detecting Collusion: The Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation Case

Author

Listed:
  • Sheng Qiwen

    (Department of Economics, Sacred Heart University, Fairfield, USA)

  • Vukina Tomislav

    (Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA)

Abstract

In this paper we investigated the dynamic of competition in the U.S. broiler chicken industry from 2000 to 2023, focusing on the detection and the implications of alleged collusive behaviour. By employing a structural econometrics approach, we estimated the conjectural elasticities, offering an explanation for how potential collusive arrangements evolved over time. Our most important results show that the alleged collusion period elevated the conjectural elasticities for all defendants but increased the conjectural elasticity of the group of three largest publicly traded broiler companies the most. These results suggest that the industry tacit collusion could have morphed into explicit collusion, with the largest three firms being the likely leaders of the conspiracy. In addition, the computed Lerner indexes show that the market power has increased during the collusion period relative to the pre-collusion period and remained elevated afterwards, suggesting stubborn impact of collusion on competition even during the post collusion period.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheng Qiwen & Vukina Tomislav, 2025. "A Conjectural Variations Approach to Detecting Collusion: The Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation Case," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 23(1), pages 17-33.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:bjafio:v:23:y:2025:i:1:p:17-33:n:1003
    DOI: 10.1515/jafio-2024-0020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jafio-2024-0020
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jafio-2024-0020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:bjafio:v:23:y:2025:i:1:p:17-33:n:1003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.