Author
Listed:
- Rodriguez Sarina
(8789 University of California Davis , Davis, CA, USA)
- Kagawa Rose
(Department of Emergency Medicine, 8789 University of California Davis , Davis, CA, USA)
- Koundinya Vikram
(Center for Regional Change, 8789 University of California Davis , Davis, CA, USA)
- Choe Daniel
(Department of Human Ecology, 8789 University of California Davis , Davis, CA, USA)
- Vaitla Bapu
(TH Chan School of Public Health, University of Harvard, Cambridge, USA)
- Volzer Alyx
(8789 University of California Davis , Davis, CA, USA)
- Brinkley Catherine
(8789 University of California Davis , 2333 Hart Hall, 1 Shields Avenue, 95616-5270, Davis, CA, USA)
Abstract
Cash assistance programs have been piloted as Basic or Guaranteed Income across the United States. This research asks how programs are being designed and evaluated, with implications for how collective program impacts are understood. To answer this question, we assemble and review 105 programs based in the United States, covering over 40,000 beneficiaries. We compare eligibility criteria, funding sources, distribution amounts, program administration, pilot duration, and evaluation measures. We find that just over half of the programs use income-based qualifications and most (84 %) have some form of place-based eligibility criteria defined by residence. The plurality of programs (28) are based in California (CA) and 16 operate at the county level. We also find that while the development of pilots often uses community development framing, funding and evaluation measures tend to be more aligned with either economic or public health intervention assessments. As multiple fields of study engage with poverty alleviation, our findings add nuance to the complex and continuously developing landscape of interventions and evaluations.
Suggested Citation
Rodriguez Sarina & Kagawa Rose & Koundinya Vikram & Choe Daniel & Vaitla Bapu & Volzer Alyx & Brinkley Catherine, 2025.
"Guaranteed Income: A Policy Landscape Review of 105 Programs in the United States,"
Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 20(1), pages 93-123.
Handle:
RePEc:bpj:bistud:v:20:y:2025:i:1:p:93-123:n:1003
DOI: 10.1515/bis-2023-0030
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:bistud:v:20:y:2025:i:1:p:93-123:n:1003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.