IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Quality Improvements, the Structure of Employment, and the Skill-bias Hypothesis Revisited

Listed author(s):
  • Grossmann Volker


    (University of Zürich)

This paper examines the impact of technological progress in the effectiveness of quality-improving, demand-enhancing activities on wage inequality and the employment structure in an ideal variety model of monopolistic competition. In a first step, it is shown that such technological change leads to a higher non-production employment share in the economy, in turn raising price mark-up factors for differentiated goods. Moreover, accounting for the fact that demand-enhancing activities are skill-intensive, the model provides a novel mechanism for the way in which new technologies affect the relative demand for skilled labor in the economy. Although an increased effectiveness of product innovations raises the demand for skilled labor in the differentiated goods sector, the impact on wage inequality is generally ambiguous if, in addition, there is a low-skilled intensive, homogenous goods sector. This is because higher mark-ups in the differentiated goods sector may shift the goods demand structure towards standardized goods. Finally, these results are compared with the impact of "skill-biased" process innovations, which have primarily been considered in the theoretical skill-bias literature. Using a simple illustration, it is argued that, once analytically distinguishing between production-related and quality-improving tasks, skill-biased process innovations do not necessarily lead to a rise in skill premia even in a one-sector model.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by De Gruyter in its journal The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics.

Volume (Year): 2 (2002)
Issue (Month): 1 (April)
Pages: 1-25

in new window

Handle: RePEc:bpj:bejmac:v:topics.2:y:2002:i:1:n:2
Contact details of provider: Web page:

Order Information: Web:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:bejmac:v:topics.2:y:2002:i:1:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Golla)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.