Quality Improvements, the Structure of Employment, and the Skill-bias Hypothesis Revisited
This paper examines the impact of technological progress in the effectiveness of quality-improving, demand-enhancing activities on wage inequality and the employment structure in an ideal variety model of monopolistic competition. In a first step, it is shown that such technological change leads to a higher non-production employment share in the economy, in turn raising price mark-up factors for differentiated goods. Moreover, accounting for the fact that demand-enhancing activities are skill-intensive, the model provides a novel mechanism for the way in which new technologies affect the relative demand for skilled labor in the economy. Although an increased effectiveness of product innovations raises the demand for skilled labor in the differentiated goods sector, the impact on wage inequality is generally ambiguous if, in addition, there is a low-skilled intensive, homogenous goods sector. This is because higher mark-ups in the differentiated goods sector may shift the goods demand structure towards standardized goods. Finally, these results are compared with the impact of "skill-biased" process innovations, which have primarily been considered in the theoretical skill-bias literature. Using a simple illustration, it is argued that, once analytically distinguishing between production-related and quality-improving tasks, skill-biased process innovations do not necessarily lead to a rise in skill premia even in a one-sector model.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 2 (2002)
Issue (Month): 1 (April)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.degruyter.com|
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/bejm|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:bejmac:v:topics.2:y:2002:i:1:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Golla)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.