IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ajlecn/v8y2017i1p10n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Jurisprudent Shift in China: A Functional Interpretation

Author

Listed:
  • Qiao Cong-rui

    (Faculty of Law, Economics and Governance, Utrecht University, Office 1.34, Achter Sint Pieter 200, 3512 HT Utrecht, The Netherlands)

Abstract

In light of the limitation of normative narratives of Chinese jurisprudence, this article proposes a functional interpretation of how the law evolved in China and how the jurisprudence was formalized to cope with major social challenges in the society. Through an examination on historiographical findings and official documentation, the article outlines the extent to which legal norms and institutions succeed in accommodating dominant social consciousness in a particular context, and reveals the interplay between norms and mechanisms respectively in ancient China (around 400 B.C. to the mid-19th century) and modern China (the late 19th century to the 20th century) respectively. The article concludes that in China’s transformational context where people are on a frequent mobility and tend to be assertive toward the government, the jurisprudent shift is likely to be formulated in favor of procedural fairness, insensitive to kinship relations and political beliefs. The shift so too allows one to predict the governant reactions to individual claims.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiao Cong-rui, 2017. "Jurisprudent Shift in China: A Functional Interpretation," Asian Journal of Law and Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ajlecn:v:8:y:2017:i:1:p:10:n:4
    DOI: 10.1515/ajle-2016-0030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ajle-2016-0030
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ajle-2016-0030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ajlecn:v:8:y:2017:i:1:p:10:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.