IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ajlecn/v2y2012i4n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Taiwan, Tourism, and Trademarks: Protecting Aboriginal Culture

Author

Listed:
  • Lee Anny

    (Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law)

  • Wu Stacy

    (Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law)

Abstract

The Taiwanese government has long used and endorsed aboriginal culture (e.g., in the form of theme parks, cartoons, music, and films) to grow local industries and attract tourism. By showcasing indigenous culture on the world stage, Taiwan's entertainment and tourism industries have developed in mainstream society a sense of pride in its living native treasures. The conscious effort to diversify what it means to be Taiwanese has resulted, somewhat ironically, in a sort of communal identity. Accordingly, some scholars believe that indigenous culture should belong to the public domain. Indeed, the injection of aboriginal culture into the mainstream has had positive and negative effects. On the one hand, the entry of indigenous culture into the mainstream has provided formerly overlooked minority groups with new resources and societal leverage, as well as educated the Taiwanese people about diversity. On the other hand, the capitalization of traditional culture by non-aboriginal entities can be detrimental to aboriginal self-sufficiency and preservation efforts. This paper examines the different levels of protection of traditional culture for aboriginal tribes. Part II discusses the legislations currently in place for the benefits of the aborigines, and the recent controversy surrounding government procedures in defining the legal statuses of the aboriginal tribes. Part III looks at the efficacy of domestic legislation vis-à-vis international treaties. Part IV describes the role of intellectual property rights in a private settlement between a film production company and the Seediq tribe.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee Anny & Wu Stacy, 2012. "Taiwan, Tourism, and Trademarks: Protecting Aboriginal Culture," Asian Journal of Law and Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 2(4), pages 1-21, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ajlecn:v:2:y:2012:i:4:n:4
    DOI: 10.1515/2154-4611.1065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/2154-4611.1065
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/2154-4611.1065?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ajlecn:v:2:y:2012:i:4:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.