IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ajlecn/v16y2025i2p207-226n1004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is the Mixed Economic System of North Korea Sustainable in the Long Run?: An Evolutionary Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Berg Nathan

    (University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand)

  • Kim Jeong-Yoo

    (Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea)

  • Yoon Seung Bi

    (Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea)

Abstract

In this paper, we attempt to analyze whether North Korea’s mixed economic system, with a planned sector and an illegal market sector, is sustainable in the long run. Using an evolutionary game theoretic approach, our model describes distinct ways in which North Korea’s planned economy could eventually be displaced by a decentralized market economy. As more people trade using unofficial market transactions, the probability that they will be apprehended and punished or fined declines, thereby increasing the expected payoff from market transactions. An extension of this model demonstrates how the government could introduce legal but more restricted markets as a strategy to prevent further decentralization. Our model suggests, however, that there is perhaps surprisingly broad scope for government-owned stores to become replaced by private markets. Evolutionary game theory provides one way to understand which kinds of shocks could lead to such a transition in which economic agents gradually adopt trading institutions that fit better with their changing environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Berg Nathan & Kim Jeong-Yoo & Yoon Seung Bi, 2025. "Is the Mixed Economic System of North Korea Sustainable in the Long Run?: An Evolutionary Approach," Asian Journal of Law and Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 16(2), pages 207-226.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ajlecn:v:16:y:2025:i:2:p:207-226:n:1004
    DOI: 10.1515/ajle-2025-0042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ajle-2025-0042
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ajle-2025-0042?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • P2 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ajlecn:v:16:y:2025:i:2:p:207-226:n:1004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyterbrill.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.