IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ajlecn/v15y2024i1p1-29n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Cloning of the Dead: Exploring the Optimal Default Rule

Author

Listed:
  • Iwasaki Masaki

    (Seoul National University School of Law, Seoul, The Republic of Korea)

Abstract

We conducted a survey experiment in the U.S. to analyze how the consent or dissent of a deceased individual influences the social acceptability of digital resurrection. The results showed a substantial relative treatment effect of consent versus dissent, with a 2-point difference in acceptability on a 5-point scale. When the deceased had consented, 58 % of respondents viewed digital resurrection as socially acceptable, whereas this number was only 3 % when the deceased had dissented. These findings suggest that relevant legal regulations should respect the decision of the deceased. Our study then explored the optimal default rule using observational research: 59 % of respondents were against the idea of their own digital resurrection. An opt-in rule seems socially desirable, where the default is the prohibition of digital resurrection, and exceptions allow it only with consent from the deceased.

Suggested Citation

  • Iwasaki Masaki, 2024. "Digital Cloning of the Dead: Exploring the Optimal Default Rule," Asian Journal of Law and Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 15(1), pages 1-29, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ajlecn:v:15:y:2024:i:1:p:1-29:n:3
    DOI: 10.1515/ajle-2023-0125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ajle-2023-0125
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ajle-2023-0125?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    digital clone; digital resurrection; deep learning; large language model; default rule;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K00 - Law and Economics - - General - - - General (including Data Sources and Description)
    • K24 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Cyber Law
    • L86 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ajlecn:v:15:y:2024:i:1:p:1-29:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.