IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ajlecn/v13y2022i3p351-373n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of the Code of Ethics and Corporate Ethical Values on the Ethical Judgment of Auditors: Evidence from Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Le Thi Thu Ha

    (Banking Academy, Hanoi, Vietnam, and Institute of Business Research, University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City (UEH), Vietnam)

  • Vo Xuan Vinh

    (University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City (UEH) and CFVG Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam)

Abstract

Accounting fraud and auditing fraud are important areas of research that have both theoretical and practical implications. A strong and sound code of ethics and ethical values are in place in order to prevent these frauds. The study investigates the impact of the code of ethics and audit firms’ corporate ethical values on auditors’ ethical judgment in Vietnam. Based on questionnaires collected from Vietnamese auditors, the results of the study indicate that the code of ethics for professional accountants has a significant influence on the auditors’ ethical judgment. Whereas the finding only shows minor support for the influence of the audit firms’ corporate ethical values on the auditors’ ethical judgment. The study has implications for audit firms and professional bodies in their continuous efforts to promote understanding and compliance with the code of ethics and develop a strong corporate ethical culture in the firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Le Thi Thu Ha & Vo Xuan Vinh, 2022. "The Influence of the Code of Ethics and Corporate Ethical Values on the Ethical Judgment of Auditors: Evidence from Vietnam," Asian Journal of Law and Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 13(3), pages 351-373, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ajlecn:v:13:y:2022:i:3:p:351-373:n:3
    DOI: 10.1515/ajle-2022-0015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ajle-2022-0015
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ajle-2022-0015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ajlecn:v:13:y:2022:i:3:p:351-373:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.