IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ajlecn/v12y2021i3p287-297n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vicarious Liability Under a Strict Liability Rule

Author

Listed:
  • Chun Se-Hak

    (Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Nowon-gu, Seoul, Korea)

  • Kim Jeong-Yoo

    (Department of Economics, Kyung Hee University, 1 Hoegidong, Dongdaemunku, Seoul 130-701, Korea)

Abstract

In this article, we extend the model of Newman, H., and D. Wright. 1990. “Strict Liability in a Principal-Agent Model.” International Review of Law and Economics 10: 219–231 and strengthens their result that the strict liability can attain social optimum in a principal-agent relation to the situation in which the court appreciates any contractual terms regarding apportionment of damages between an employer and an employee under vicarious liability rule. Our model also generalizes and extends vicarious liability to the negligence-based liability rule.

Suggested Citation

  • Chun Se-Hak & Kim Jeong-Yoo, 2021. "Vicarious Liability Under a Strict Liability Rule," Asian Journal of Law and Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 12(3), pages 287-297, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ajlecn:v:12:y:2021:i:3:p:287-297:n:3
    DOI: 10.1515/ajle-2021-0045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ajle-2021-0045
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ajle-2021-0045?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    vicarious liability; strict liability; joint and several liability; negligence rule; judgement-proof;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K13 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Tort Law and Product Liability; Forensic Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ajlecn:v:12:y:2021:i:3:p:287-297:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.