IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ajlecn/v12y2021i3p213-235n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effects of Tax Penalty on Retained Earnings: Evidence from Quasi-Natural Experiment in South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Byun Yiseul

    (Korea Institute of Public Finance, Sejong, Korea)

  • Binh Ki Beom
  • Woo Seokjin

    (Department of Economics, Myongji University, Seodaemun-gu03674, Korea)

Abstract

This paper evaluated how the tax penalty, corporate income feedback tax (CIFT), on retained earnings affected firms’ managerial decisions in South Korea. We focused on how the firms allocated the retained earnings to minimize the additional tax liability. We employed a quasi-natural experiment design resulting from the enactment of the CIFT in 2015 to identify how the tax penalty on earning retention affected investment, dividend, and employment. We took advantage of the eligibility condition of the CIFT to construct a quasi-natural experimental design. Our estimation results show that most firms subject to the CIFT paid out dividends to equity holders to avoid additional tax liabilities despite of modest increase of investment. They did not change wages much. Rather, they decreased wage payment. In sum, the CIFT was not as successful as Korean government wished.

Suggested Citation

  • Byun Yiseul & Binh Ki Beom & Woo Seokjin, 2021. "The Effects of Tax Penalty on Retained Earnings: Evidence from Quasi-Natural Experiment in South Korea," Asian Journal of Law and Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 12(3), pages 213-235, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ajlecn:v:12:y:2021:i:3:p:213-235:n:2
    DOI: 10.1515/ajle-2021-0056
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ajle-2021-0056
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ajle-2021-0056?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ajlecn:v:12:y:2021:i:3:p:213-235:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.