IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ajlecn/v10y2019i3p17n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the Employment Status of Gig-Workers in China’s Sharing Economy Era–An Empirical Legal Study

Author

Listed:
  • Xiao Shanyun

    (City University of Hong Kong, School of Law, Room 4431, Mong Man-wai Building, Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong)

Abstract

The prevalence of the Internet Plus model and mobile applications have brought people into the era of sharing economy, thus accelerating the generation of the “gig-worker.” Foreign experiences have tended to classify gig-workers as employees or as an additional employment category. However, reviewing China’s domestic practices, employment legislation is not enough to keep up with this innovative working style because the work classification and supporting mechanisms for gig-workers have not yet been explicated. This paper identifies the major types of gig-workers that have arisen and investigates 110 court cases to better understand the employment status of gig-workers in China. The empirical results indicate that the judgements of similar facts are diverse in the absence of a unified employment standard. Therefore, it is recommended that the work classification of gig-workers be clarified, lawful access to benefit plans and work protection system be safeguarded, and burden of accident liabilities be fairly distributed.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiao Shanyun, 2019. "Understanding the Employment Status of Gig-Workers in China’s Sharing Economy Era–An Empirical Legal Study," Asian Journal of Law and Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ajlecn:v:10:y:2019:i:3:p:17:n:1
    DOI: 10.1515/ajle-2019-0019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ajle-2019-0019
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ajle-2019-0019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ajlecn:v:10:y:2019:i:3:p:17:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.