IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/aelcon/v15y2025i2p325-346n1006.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The (Social) Tasks of Business Tax Research and the Binding Effect of the Statutory Tax Burden Decision

Author

Listed:
  • Kollruss Thomas

    (38968 Tax Research , Berlin, Germany)

Abstract

Against the background of taxation, this article critically examines Schmiel’s commentary “Why tax planning without considering societal interests is unfounded” (https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2021-0115) and points out the overarching context. This rejoinder argues that the task and the object of my business tax research article, namely to analyse value-neutral tax regulations, in this case the ATAD CFC taxation regulations, with regard to their effectiveness and their achievement of objectives and to derive practical consequences for future tax legislation and further legislative development of the existing tax regulations. Through such an analysis, deficits in the effectiveness of the current tax regulations are revealed at an early stage and the legislator can react before tax losses occur (early information function). This is precisely how social interests are pursued and answered. Moreover, this rejoinder argues that in the area of taxation, it is exclusively the tax legislator who determines in the democratic legislative process which objectives, steering effects and (tax) burden effects it pursues with a norm and to what extent it pursues these objectives. The extent to which the legislator pursues societal or social interests with a tax norm is up to the legislator. This is the so-called assessment prerogative, i.e. the prerogative of the legislature (norm-setter) to decide on the appropriateness and necessity of a particular statutory regulation to achieve a legitimate goal in an ultimately binding manner, taking into account the interests of the state as a whole. This rejoinder rejects’ Schmiel’s claim to use critical rationalism as a methodological framework for research on tax law. From my viewpoint, only the objective will of the legislator (objective intention of the legislator, aim of the law, principle of legality) and the relevant legal principles and methodology as well as the methods of business tax research are relevant when it comes to examining the scope of application of current tax law provisions and their effectiveness, here the CFC taxation rules. Alternative theories such as critical rationalism, a philosophical view, appear to be too vague to ensure legal certainty and appropriate taxation.

Suggested Citation

  • Kollruss Thomas, 2025. "The (Social) Tasks of Business Tax Research and the Binding Effect of the Statutory Tax Burden Decision," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 15(2), pages 325-346.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:aelcon:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:325-346:n:1006
    DOI: 10.1515/ael-2022-0089
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2022-0089
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ael-2022-0089?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    business tax research; taxation; principles of taxation; principle of legality;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K40 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - General
    • K34 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Tax Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:aelcon:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:325-346:n:1006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.