Author
Listed:
- Tsindeliani Imeda
(Russian State University of Justice, Moscow, Russian Federation)
- Egorova Maria
(Kutafin Moscow State Law University, Moscow, Russian Federation)
- Vasilyeva Evgeniya
(North Caucasus Branch of the Russian State University of Justice, Krasnodar, Russian Federation)
- Bit-Shabo Inessa
(Russian State University of Justice, Moscow, Russian Federation)
- Kikavets Vitaly
(Russian State University of Justice, Moscow, Russian Federation)
Abstract
The problem of aggressive tax optimization and the related issue of liability of individuals who are the ultimate beneficiaries of company’s tax liabilities are becoming more and more regulatory complex. The purpose of the study, implemented using the system-functional method, is to theoretically substantiate the ways to overcome the problems that arise when collecting taxes in favor of the state from the ultimate beneficiaries. The results of the study indicate that the corporate structure cannot fully protect the beneficiary of an enterprise from property liability for committing a tax offense. The study proposes a strategy to improve the efficiency of collection of receivables from real beneficiaries. The results of this study are of great practical importance for the subjects of legislative initiative and practitioners in the field of tax legal relations. If under the conditions of the Russian legal system until 2016 it was practically impossible to prove the informal connection of a company with an actual beneficiary, then as a result of the adoption of Federal Law No. 401-FZ of November 30, 2016, the courts began to take into account any evidence that could become an argument for bringing the ultimate beneficiary to justice. This in turn led to the emergence of controversial issues. For this reason, the authors highlighted the problems arising as a result of law enforcement.
Suggested Citation
Tsindeliani Imeda & Egorova Maria & Vasilyeva Evgeniya & Bit-Shabo Inessa & Kikavets Vitaly, 2025.
"Collection of Taxes from Ultimate Beneficiaries: Russian Regulatory Model,"
Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 15(2), pages 199-222.
Handle:
RePEc:bpj:aelcon:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:199-222:n:1002
DOI: 10.1515/ael-2020-0149
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- K10 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - General (Constitutional Law)
- K34 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Tax Law
- K35 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Personal Bankruptcy Law
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:aelcon:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:199-222:n:1002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyterbrill.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.