IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Health Services Approach to the Communication Audit

Listed author(s):
  • Tereza Balcarová


    (Czech University of Life Sciences Prague)

Registered author(s):

    This paper deals with the use of a communication audit as a tool for evaluating the effectiveness of public relations within health services. The research was conducted within healthcare institutions operating in the Czech Republic. Areas of research questions were focused on these aspects of health services: The approach to the implementation of a communication audit: Is the communication audit tied to the level of public relations effectiveness evaluation? Is the approach influenced by public relations staff specialization? Is the approach affected by the type of health services according to the typology defined by the Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic? Can we consider the health services communication audit usable? For Health services who stated that they implement a communication audit, further research was focused on reporting audit results, linking the budget with results of the audit, the auditor's relationship with the rated entity, and the criteria for an effective audit. Related hypotheses were tested statistically and the approaches to the implementation of the communication audit were clustered using the Ward cluster analysis. Research has identified three levels of approach of health services to implementation of the audit. These were the variables used for determining the levels: audit outputs of health services, relation to the public relations budget, the person conducting the audit and the typical characteristics of audit realization. Small commitment is evidenced by the public relations executives, by which a lack of interest has been identified and to some extent, ignorance of standards for implementation of a communication audit.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice in its journal Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionales.

    Volume (Year): 17 (2014)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 61-71

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:boh:actaub:v:17:y:2014:i:1:p:61-71
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Studentská 13, 370 05 České Budĕjovice

    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boh:actaub:v:17:y:2014:i:1:p:61-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Tereza Š ástková)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.