IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bnu/journl/v8y2017i2p30-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

. Comparative analysis of foreign and domestic experience of institutional support for the development of the forest sector

Author

Listed:
  • B. Shumlyanskyi
  • H. Berezhnytska

    (Lviv National Agrarian University)

Abstract

It is proved that the sphere of forestry requires immediate organizational and economic transformations in the management system according to the European principles of decentralization and division of powers in order to prevent conflicts of interest, to ensure the self-sustainability of the industry and to take into account the interests of territorial communities in the context of modern complex realities of the country’s development. The main disadvantages and gaps in the formation of institutional support for the development of the forest sector of Ukraine were found. The author has proposed the main benchmarks for his reforming scenario, which would ensure an improvement of the institutional environment as a means to increase the efficiency of using the potential of the forestry sector in Ukraine

Suggested Citation

  • B. Shumlyanskyi & H. Berezhnytska, 2017. ". Comparative analysis of foreign and domestic experience of institutional support for the development of the forest sector," Balanced Nature Using, Institute of agroecology and environmental management, vol. 8(2), pages 30-37, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bnu:journl:v:8:y:2017:i:2:p:30-37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://natureus.org.ua/repec/archive/2_2017/6.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bnu:journl:v:8:y:2017:i:2:p:30-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Olexii Shkuratov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaeemua.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.