IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/blg/msudev/v7y2015i1p33-36n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Technological Evaluation of Sourdoughs Prepared in Different Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Ognean Claudia Felicia

    (Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Romania)

Abstract

The use of sourdough in bread production lead to development of safe, healthy and more palatable product and also contribute to the sustainability of breadmaking through low demands for additives and preservatives. Sourdoughs type I were obtained with different flour: water ratio: 1:0.6; 1:1; 1:2 and 1:3 and different refreshment ratio 1:3 and 1:4. The sourdough were evaluated for theirs pH, Total Titratable Acidity (TTA), lactic and acetic contents, gas production power. The use of low water level induce a higher TTA and pH but the yield of acid production was more favourable for the sourdough with higher water content. The higher water content was favourable to formation of lactic acid and induced a better lactic: acetic acid ratio, 15.5 which was by far superior to the 6.5 ratio obtained in the driest dough. The more liquid sourdough had a better ability to produce gases. Flour : water ratio 1:2 are recommended to obtain high quality sourdough, with a better smell and taste, with a high yield, easy to handle and using relative low spaces. Refreshment ratio 1:4 delivery comparable results with 1:3 refreshment ratio and implies lower volumes for fermentations.

Suggested Citation

  • Ognean Claudia Felicia, 2015. "The Technological Evaluation of Sourdoughs Prepared in Different Conditions," Management of Sustainable Development, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 7(1), pages 33-36, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:blg:msudev:v:7:y:2015:i:1:p:33-36:n:6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/msd.2015.7.issue-1/msd-2015-0019/msd-2015-0019.xml?format=INT
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:blg:msudev:v:7:y:2015:i:1:p:33-36:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Camelia Oprean-Stan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feulbro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.