IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/worlde/v41y2018i3p723-737.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Islamic economics and a third fundamental theorem of welfare economics

Author

Listed:
  • Hayat Khan

Abstract

The discipline of economics started as a moral science but became detached from moral concerns over time to emulate natural science and to adopt positivism. Consequently, mainstream economics assumes people to be sordidly selfish. The teachings of Islam, however, promote social preferences where individuals should be other†regarding and have preferences over social outcomes. This paper replaces the selfish agent with a social agent and presents the results in a theorem referred to as the third fundamental theorem of welfare economics (TFTWE). The TFTWE states that “when the selfish agents are replaced with the social agents, market outcomes are Pareto optimal, equitable, and unique†. This is an important result which has widespread implications. We show that the TFTWE holds under conditions where the first two fundamental theorems of welfare economics fail and that a Walrasian equilibrium is more likely to exist when selfish preferences are non†convex. Unlike the popular convention, there is no equity†efficiency trade†off. In fact we point to the possibility of reversal in equity†efficiency trade†off.

Suggested Citation

  • Hayat Khan, 2018. "Islamic economics and a third fundamental theorem of welfare economics," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 723-737, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:worlde:v:41:y:2018:i:3:p:723-737
    DOI: 10.1111/twec.12508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12508
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/twec.12508?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gianluca Grimalda & Alain Trannoy & Fernando Filgueira & Karl Ove Moene, 2020. "Egalitarian redistribution in the era of hyper-globalization," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 78(2), pages 151-184, April.
    2. Necati Aydin & Hayat Khan, 2021. "G-Donic Happiness: An Alternative to Hedonic and Eudemonic Happiness for Sustainable Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Nayeli Hernandez-Martinez & Nevin Mutlu & Jan C. Fransoo, 2021. "Social equity in supplier–buyer relationships in smallholder agri-food supply chains," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 1027-1089, December.
    4. Ezzedine Ghlamallah, 2023. "Sustainable Development And Islamic Economics Paradigms Compared," Post-Print hal-04363875, HAL.
    5. Ghlamallah, Ezzedine & Alexakis, Christos & Dowling, Michael & Piepenbrink, Anke, 2021. "The topics of Islamic economics and finance research," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 145-160.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:worlde:v:41:y:2018:i:3:p:723-737. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0378-5920 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.