IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stratm/v47y2026i8p2208-2234.html

Thinking and feeling about novelty: How cognition and emotion shape investment in novel ideas

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew P. Mount
  • Henry Tue Le
  • Gary Bowman
  • Christopher Golding

Abstract

While prior research on the strategic framing of innovation highlights the cognitive mechanisms underlying novelty evaluation, we know little about the corresponding emotional mechanisms. Drawing on appraisal theory, construal level theory, and the literature on emotions, we theorize two distinct appraisal‐emotion pathways through which the framing of novel ideas evokes hope and awe among investors with different motives. We argue that high‐construal framing supplements economically motivated investors' low‐level feasibility orientation, which evokes hope and increases their willingness to invest. By contrast, low‐construal framing supplements non‐economically motivated investors' high‐level desirability orientation, which evokes awe and increases their willingness to invest. We test and find some support for these within‐motive pathways across three studies. Our study offers new theoretical and practical insights on the strategic framing of novel ideas.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew P. Mount & Henry Tue Le & Gary Bowman & Christopher Golding, 2026. "Thinking and feeling about novelty: How cognition and emotion shape investment in novel ideas," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(8), pages 2208-2234, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:47:y:2026:i:8:p:2208-2234
    DOI: 10.1002/smj.70085
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.70085
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/smj.70085?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:47:y:2026:i:8:p:2208-2234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/0143-2095 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.