Author
Listed:
- Charlotte Jacobs
- Gwendolyn K. Lee
Abstract
Research Summary For endogenous shaping to be recognized as an evolutionary process that helps explain the co‐evolution of firms and their environment, theories on shaping need to provide a direct link between the endogenously introduced modifications and the evolutionary trajectory of actors in the industry. Integrating insights from the sensemaking literature into the evolutionary perspective on shaping, we establish this link and identify evolutionary feedback—the response of market actors to endogenous modifications—as a distinct feature in the shaping process. To advance toward more generalized theorizing on the mechanisms of the shaping process, we ground our theoretical insights in a real‐life case by conducting a history‐friendly study of endogenous shaping and evolutionary feedback in the photovoltaic cell industry. Managerial Summary Understanding how firms actively shape their environment is essential for explaining industry evolution. This study highlights the need for theories on shaping to establish a link between shapers' modifications to the industry environment and the evolutionary trajectory of firms. By integrating sensemaking insights into the evolutionary economics perspective on shaping, we provide this link and demonstrate that evolutionary feedback—market actors' responses to endogenous changes—is a distinctive feature of the shaping process. We demonstrate the shaping process and evolutionary feedback in the photovoltaic cell industry. Our findings illustrate how endogenous modifications to the industry environment triggered evolutionary feedback. This research gives managers a deeper understanding of how their strategic decisions can influence evolutionary trajectories, highlighting the importance of evolutionary feedback in this process.
Suggested Citation
Charlotte Jacobs & Gwendolyn K. Lee, 2025.
"Endogenous shaping as an evolutionary process: An empirical demonstration with the photovoltaic cell industry, 1976–2010,"
Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(7), pages 1666-1699, July.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:stratm:v:46:y:2025:i:7:p:1666-1699
DOI: 10.1002/smj.3703
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:46:y:2025:i:7:p:1666-1699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/0143-2095 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.