IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stratm/v46y2025i12p3048-3091.html

Cutting the apron strings: Establishing optimal distinctiveness from mentors in creative industries

Author

Listed:
  • Daphne Ann Demetry
  • Rachel Doern

Abstract

Research has established that organizations benefit from “optimal distinctiveness,” that is, being sufficiently similar to and different from competitors. However, we know less about producers' strategic positioning choices to establish optimally distinctive identities. We explore this question through a qualitative study of chef‐owners who started their own restaurants after training with well‐known mentors. We identify two trajectories followed by chefs to establish optimal distinctiveness—legacy and divergent—and their components: interpersonal origins, strategic material and symbolic practices, tensions, and performance outcomes. Our study contributes to research by providing a more complete picture of how creative producers attempt to find an optimal balance between similarity to and difference from mentors, and the constraints they face in their strategic choices, including how these change over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Daphne Ann Demetry & Rachel Doern, 2025. "Cutting the apron strings: Establishing optimal distinctiveness from mentors in creative industries," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(12), pages 3048-3091, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:46:y:2025:i:12:p:3048-3091
    DOI: 10.1002/smj.70003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.70003
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/smj.70003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:46:y:2025:i:12:p:3048-3091. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/0143-2095 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.