IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v99y2018i5p1551-1571.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Gender Gap in Financial Knowledge: Decomposing the Effects of Don't Know and Incorrect Responses

Author

Listed:
  • Zibei Chen
  • James C. Garand

Abstract

Objectives Past studies have consistently shown that women have lower levels of financial knowledge than men, and hence there is a noticeable gender gap in financial knowledge. We reconsider the conventional measures of financial knowledge by disentangling don't know (DK) responses and incorrect answers and comparing the effect of these two disparate responses’ on the gender gap in financial knowledge. Methods Using data from the 2012 National Financial Capability Studies data set, we estimate a series of ordinary least squares regression and multinomial logit models of the gender gap in DK and incorrect responses. Results We find a strong gender gap in financial knowledge, but with a twist: (1) men are more likely to offer correct answers; (2) women are slightly more likely to offer incorrect answers; but (3) women are considerably more likely to provide DK responses. Hence women may exhibit lower levels of financial knowledge because they lose the opportunity to hazard a guess and arrive at a correct answer based either on partial knowledge or on random chance. We consider the possibility that there are psychological processes at work involving risk acceptance and confidence in financial knowledge that prompt women to give DK responses at a rate higher than men. Conclusion We suggest that future research should consider the relative roles of DK and incorrect responses in measuring financial knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Zibei Chen & James C. Garand, 2018. "On the Gender Gap in Financial Knowledge: Decomposing the Effects of Don't Know and Incorrect Responses," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 99(5), pages 1551-1571, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:99:y:2018:i:5:p:1551-1571
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12520
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.12520?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elizabeth Ooi, 2020. "Give mind to the gap: Measuring gender differences in financial knowledge," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(3), pages 931-950, September.
    2. Raquel Fonseca & Simon Lord, 2020. "Canadian Gender Gap in Financial Literacy: Confidence Matters," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 235(4), pages 153-182, December.
    3. Andrzej Cwynar & Beata Świecka & Kamil Filipek & Robert Porzak, 2022. "Consumers' knowledge of cashless payments: Development, validation, and usability of a measurement scale," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(2), pages 640-665, June.
    4. Familia, Thomas & Horne, Christine, 2022. "Customer trust in their utility company and interest in household-level battery storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:99:y:2018:i:5:p:1551-1571. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.