IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v99y2018i4p1426-1445.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Radical Is Too Radical? Public Perception of Taiwanese Environmental Nonprofit Organizations’ Activism

Author

Listed:
  • Li‐Yin Liu

Abstract

Objective This study sought answers to two important unasked questions: (1) How does the Taiwanese public perceive different types of environmental activism initiated by environmental nonprofit organizations (ENPOs)? And (2) How does culture influence these perceptions? Methods This study utilized cultural theory (CT) to develop hypotheses to test data collected through an online survey in Taiwan. Results The evidence confirms what CT predicted: egalitarians tended to consider protest‐based environmental activities as effective and acceptable, while individualists tended to have negative thoughts about the effectiveness and acceptance of protest‐based activities. Conclusion This study found that CT can also be helpful in studying environmental activism, especially in countries, like Taiwan, where ideological lines and partisan differences on environmental issues are not clear. Moreover, compared to conventional partisan and ideological explanations, CT better explains the determinants of public perceptions regarding environmental activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Li‐Yin Liu, 2018. "How Radical Is Too Radical? Public Perception of Taiwanese Environmental Nonprofit Organizations’ Activism," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 99(4), pages 1426-1445, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:99:y:2018:i:4:p:1426-1445
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12507
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12507
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.12507?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:99:y:2018:i:4:p:1426-1445. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.