IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v103y2022i3p699-708.html

Can a constitutional monarch influence democratic preferences? Japanese emperor and the regulation of public expression

Author

Listed:
  • Susumu Annaka
  • Gento Kato

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study examines whether hereditary constitutional monarchs have any influence on democratic public opinion, focusing on the case of the Japanese emperor. Methods A survey experiment on the regulation of public expression. This issue can be framed both as left wing (i.e., the regulation of hate speech) and right wing (i.e., the regulation of publicly funded anti‐nationalistic exhibitions). Taking advantage of the dual nature of the issue, we test the effects of the emperor's endorsement on support for regulation under each ideological frame. Results The (former) emperor's endorsement for freedom of expression does have a cross‐cutting effect and decreases support for regulation. This effect is relatively small but statistically significant. Additionally, the findings provide weak evidence for the emperor's own ideological position conditioning his endorsement effect. Conclusion Hereditary monarchs do influence democratic public opinion, and their influence can cross‐cut ideology.

Suggested Citation

  • Susumu Annaka & Gento Kato, 2022. "Can a constitutional monarch influence democratic preferences? Japanese emperor and the regulation of public expression," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 103(3), pages 699-708, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:103:y:2022:i:3:p:699-708
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13152
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13152?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nick Couldry & Tim Markham, 2007. "Celebrity culture and public connection: bridge or chasm?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 52412, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Jonathon P. Schuldt & Adam R. Pearson & Rainer Romero-Canyas & Dylan Larson-Konar, 2017. "Erratum to: Brief exposure to Pope Francis heightens moral beliefs about climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 141(2), pages 179-179, March.
    3. Clifford, Scott & Sheagley, Geoffrey & Piston, Spencer, 2021. "Increasing Precision without Altering Treatment Effects: Repeated Measures Designs in Survey Experiments," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 115(3), pages 1048-1065, August.
    4. Jonathon P. Schuldt & Adam R. Pearson & Rainer Romero-Canyas & Dylan Larson-Konar, 2017. "Brief exposure to Pope Francis heightens moral beliefs about climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 141(2), pages 167-177, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adam R. Pearson & Guadalupe A. Bacio & Sarah Naiman & Rainer Romero-Canyas & Jonathon P. Schuldt, 2021. "Cultural determinants of climate change opinion: familism predicts climate beliefs and policy support among US Latinos," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 167(1), pages 1-8, July.
    2. Nela Mrchkovska & Nives Dolšak & Aseem Prakash, 2024. "Morality meets menu: investigating the impact of moral appeals on vegetarianism through a conjoint survey experiment," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(3), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Steve Westlake & Christina Demski & Nick Pidgeon, 2024. "Leading by example from high-status individuals: exploring a crucial missing link in climate change mitigation," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Adam X. Hearn & Fabian Huber & Jens Koehrsen & Ann-Lea Buzzi, 2024. "The perceived potential of religion in mitigating climate change and how this is being realized in Germany and Switzerland," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 14(2), pages 342-357, June.
    5. Tobia Spampatti & Ulf J. J. Hahnel & Evelina Trutnevyte & Tobias Brosch, 2024. "Psychological inoculation strategies to fight climate disinformation across 12 countries," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(2), pages 380-398, February.
    6. Asheley R. Landrum & Rosalynn Vasquez, 2020. "Polarized U.S. publics, Pope Francis, and climate change: Reviewing the studies and data collected around the 2015 Papal Encyclical," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(6), November.
    7. Matthew Cebul & Jonathan Pinckney, 2025. "Nonviolent alternatives reduce external support for rebel groups: Evidence from two cross-national survey experiments," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(6), pages 1839-1856, November.
    8. repec:osf:osfxxx:yqzg4_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Victor Y Wu & Richard Howarth, 2023. "Shifting partisan public opinion towards Community Choice Aggregation through outreach and awareness," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(10), pages 1-15, October.
    10. Rainey, Carlisle, 2025. "Power Rules: Practical Statistical Power Calculations," OSF Preprints 5am9q, Center for Open Science.
    11. Sou Shinomoto, 2025. "Does the military lose public confidence without compliance with civilian control? Experimental evidence from Japan," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(3), pages 564-579, May.
    12. repec:osf:osfxxx:5am9q_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Halling, Aske & Petersen, Niels Bjørn Grund, 2024. "Frontline Employees’ Responses to Citizens’ Communication of Administrative Burdens," OSF Preprints yqzg4, Center for Open Science.
    14. Briggs, Ryan C & Solodoch, Omer, 2021. "Changes in perceptions of border security influence desired levels of immigration," OSF Preprints wt74y, Center for Open Science.
    15. Hui Bai & Jan G. Voelkel & Shane Muldowney & Johannes C. Eichstaedt & Robb Willer, 2025. "LLM-generated messages can persuade humans on policy issues," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
    16. Wassim Le Lann & Gauthier Delozière & Yann Le Lann, 2023. "Greenwashing the Talents: attracting human capital through environmental pledges," Sciences Po Economics Publications (main) hal-04140191, HAL.
    17. Hoffmann, Mathias & Mönch, Emanuel & Pavlova, Lora & Schultefrankenfeld, Guido, 2023. "Forceful or persistent: Wow the ECB's new inflation target affects households' inflation expectations," Discussion Papers 27/2023, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    18. Justin Ho & Jonathan Min, 2025. "Causal Inference in Counterbalanced Within-Subjects Designs," Papers 2505.03937, arXiv.org.
    19. Gráinne Murphy & Ciara Corcoran & Mimi Tatlow-Golden & Emma Boyland & Brendan Rooney, 2020. "See, Like, Share, Remember: Adolescents’ Responses to Unhealthy-, Healthy- and Non-Food Advertising in Social Media," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-25, March.
    20. repec:osf:metaar:8z45v_v2 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Clifford, Scott & Rainey, Carlisle, 2023. "Estimators for Topic-Sampling Designs," SocArXiv 7ady6, Center for Open Science.
    22. Sirianne Dahlum & Torbjørn Hanson & Åshild Johnsen & Andreas Kotsadam & Alexander Wuttke, 2024. "Is Support for Authoritarian Rule Contagious? Evidence from Field and Survey Experiments," CESifo Working Paper Series 11490, CESifo.
    23. repec:osf:osfxxx:5am9q_v2 is not listed on IDEAS
    24. Ditlmann, Ruth & Firestone, Berenike & Turkoglu, Oguzhan, 2025. "Participating in a Digital-History Project Mobilizes People for Symbolic Justice and Better Intergroup Relations Today," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 36(4), pages 249-264.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:103:y:2022:i:3:p:699-708. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.