IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v101y2020i2p697-711.html

Forecasting National Medal Totals at the Summer Olympic Games Reconsidered

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolas Scelles
  • Wladimir Andreff
  • Liliane Bonnal
  • Madeleine Andreff
  • Pascal Favard

Abstract

Objective This article aims at explaining national medal totals at the 1992–2016 Summer Olympic Games (n = 1,289 observations) and forecasting them in 2016 (based on 1992–2012 data) and 2020 with a set of variables similar to previous studies, as well as a regional (subcontinents) variable not tested previously in the literature in English. Method Econometric testing not only resorts to a Tobit model as usual but also to a Hurdle model. Results Most variables have a significant impact on national team medal totals; it appears to be negative for most regions other than North America except Western Europe and Oceania (not significant). Then, two models (Tobit and Hurdle) are implemented to forecast national medal totals at the 2016 and 2020 Summer Olympics. Conclusion Both models are complementary for the 2016 forecast. The 2020 forecast is consistent with Olympic Medals Predictions, although some striking differences are found.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolas Scelles & Wladimir Andreff & Liliane Bonnal & Madeleine Andreff & Pascal Favard, 2020. "Forecasting National Medal Totals at the Summer Olympic Games Reconsidered," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(2), pages 697-711, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:101:y:2020:i:2:p:697-711
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12782
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12782
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.12782?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emilio Gómez-Déniz & Nancy Dávila-Cárdenes & Alejandro Leiva-Arcas & María J. Martínez-Patiño, 2021. "Measuring Efficiency in the Summer Olympic Games Disciplines: The Case of the Spanish Athletes," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Carl Singleton & J. James Reade & Johan Rewilak & Dominik Schreyer, 2021. "How big is home advantage at the Olympic Games?," Economics Discussion Papers em-dp2021-13, Department of Economics, University of Reading.
    3. David Forrest & J.D Tena & Carlos Varela-Quintana, 2020. "Who wins at the Chess Olympics? The role of resources and education capital," Working Papers 202013, University of Liverpool, Department of Economics.
    4. David Forrest & J. D. Tena & Carlos Varela-Quintana, 2023. "The influence of schooling on performance in chess and at the Olympics," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 959-982, February.
    5. Schlembach, Christoph & Schmidt, Sascha L. & Schreyer, Dominik & Wunderlich, Linus, 2022. "Forecasting the Olympic medal distribution – A socioeconomic machine learning model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    6. Christoph Schlembach & Sascha L. Schmidt & Dominik Schreyer & Linus Wunderlich, 2020. "Forecasting the Olympic medal distribution during a pandemic: a socio-economic machine learning model," Papers 2012.04378, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2021.
    7. Franklin G. Mixon Jr. & Richard J. Cebula, 2022. "Property Rights Freedom and Innovation: Eponymous Skills in Women's Gymnastics," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 23(4), pages 407-430, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:101:y:2020:i:2:p:697-711. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.