IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/rmgtin/v3y2000i2p237-249.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing Ethical Decision Making: Applying The Hunt‐Vitell Model In Insurance Courses

Author

Listed:
  • Mary Ann Boose
  • F. Peter Dean

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Although many insurance textbooks incorporate ethics cases into their material, most leave both the teacher and the student to consider what is “right” and what is not. Unfortunately, without theoretical underpinnings or formal training in ethical decision making, insurance faculty and their students are left to rely on life experience or feelings rather than critical analyses of the ethics cases. This article introduces the Hunt‐Vitell model of ethical decision making, demonstrates its usefulness in analyzing cases, and introduces a few short cases. Each case consists of a brief scenario, questions to assist the student in analyzing the ethical content of the situation, a list of key insurance terms and issues, and a list of important ethics terms and issues. The article closes with an annotated bibliography and a glossary of ethics terms.

Suggested Citation

  • Mary Ann Boose & F. Peter Dean, 2000. "Analyzing Ethical Decision Making: Applying The Hunt‐Vitell Model In Insurance Courses," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 3(2), pages 237-249, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:rmgtin:v:3:y:2000:i:2:p:237-249
    DOI: j.1540-6296.2000.tb00032.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6296.2000.tb00032.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/j.1540-6296.2000.tb00032.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:rmgtin:v:3:y:2000:i:2:p:237-249. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1098-1616 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.